The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in a recent sexual assault case that it was “problematic” for a lower court judge to refer to the alleged victim as a “woman,” implying that the more appropriate term should have been “person with a vagina.” Can you believe this lunacy?

In a ruling last Friday, the Supreme Court said that a trial judge’s use of the word “woman” may “have been unfortunate and engendered confusion.”

It wasn’t clear why the Supreme Court didn’t specify why the word “woman” is confusing, but in the ruling the court refers to the complainant as a “person with a vagina.”

Apparently some bright and esteemed people are in dire need of a basic biology class.

Copyright © Marc Stockwell-Moniz